“We consider it essentially the child’s personal time and don’t feel it should be taken away for academic or punitive reasons,” said Dr. Robert Murray, who co-authored the new policy statement for the American Academy of Pediatrics.
The statement, published Monday in the journal Pediatrics, says recess is a “crucial and necessary component of a child’s development.” Recess helps students develop communication skills, such as cooperation and sharing, and helps counteract the time they spend sitting in class, according to the statement. “The cognitive literature indicates that children are exactly as we are as adults. Whenever they’re performing a complicated or complex task, they need time to process the information,” said Murray, a professor at Ohio State University in Columbus.
“Kids have to have that time scheduled. They’re not given the opportunity to just get up and walk around for a few minutes,” he added. Previous research, according to the statement’s authors, found children pay closer attention and perform better mentally after recess. Last January, a review of 14 studies found kids who get more exercise from – among other things – recess and playing on sports teams tend to do better in school
But a 2011 survey of 1,800 elementary schools found about a third were not offering recess to their third grade classes Murray told Reuters Health that schools in Japan offer children about 10 minutes of free time after every 50 minutes of class, which he said makes sense.
“I think you can feel it if you go to a lecture that after 40 to 50 minutes of a concentrated activity you need to take a break,” he said.